Conceptual Distinctions in Hadith Studies: Understanding the Differences Between Hadith, Sunnah, Khabar, and AtsarConceptual Distinctions in Hadith Studies: Understanding the Differences Between Hadith, Sunnah, Khabar, and Atsar
Keywords:
Hadith Sunnah Khabar Atsar Conceptual Distinction Islamic ScholarshipAbstract
This study examines the conceptual distinctions between the key terms "Hadith," "Sunnah," "Khabar," and "Atsar" within the science of Hadith. While often used interchangeably in Islamic scholarship, these terms carry nuanced differences that have significant methodological implications for hadith research, verification, and transmission. Employing a qualitative approach through library research and descriptive-analytical methods, this study analyzes authoritative classical and contemporary texts to map the definitions, scopes, and scholarly debates surrounding each term. The findings reveal that "Hadith" is the most specific term, strictly referring to narrations attributed to the Prophet Muhammad (SAW). "Sunnah" has a broader scope, encompassing the Prophet's continuous practice, character, and life journey, and is heavily emphasized in legal theory (Usul al-Fiqh). "Khabar" is a more general term for "news," which, according to various scholarly opinions, can be synonymous with Hadith, refer specifically to non-prophetic reports, or encompass both. "Atsar" predominantly refers to narrations from the Companions and Successors, though it is sometimes used synonymously with Hadith. The research concludes that the semantic complexity and diverse scholarly perspectives on these terms are not merely academic but fundamentally impact the methodology of hadith studies and Islamic legal derivation. A precise understanding of these distinctions is therefore crucial for the integrity and depth of contemporary Islamic research.
Downloads
References
al-Bukhārī, M. ibn I. (2002). Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Dar Ṭawq al-Najāh.
al-Hasani, M. ibn ‘Alawi. (t.t./1421 H). Al-Manhal al-Latif fi Ushul al-Hadis al-Syarif. t.p.
al-Khaṭīb, M. ‘A. (1989). Uṣūl al-Ḥadīth: ‘Ulūmuh wa Muṣṭalaḥuh. Dar al-Fikr.
al-Shalih, S. (1991). ‘Ulum al-Hadith wa Musthalahuhu. Dar al-‘Ilm li al-Malayin.
al-Suyūṭī, J. al-D. ‘A. al-R. (2004). Tadrīb al-Rāwī fī Sharḥ Taqrīb al-Nawawī (M. ‘A. Q. ‘Aṭā’, Ed.). Dar al-Kutub al-‘Ilmiyyah.
Azami, M. M. (2003). Studies in Hadith Methodology and Literature (M. Krelaha, Penerj.). Lentera.
Azhary, M. R. F., & dkk. (2025). “Teori hermeneutika Hans-Georg Gadamer dan relevansinya terhadap hadis sujud istri kepada suami.” Penelitian. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, 3(4).
Azhary, Muhammad Royyan Faqih dkk. (2025). “Meninjau Validitas Hadis Perpecahan Umat Islam: Pendekatan Kritik ‘Ilal Matan.” Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research 5 (3). https://doi.org/10.31004/innovative.v5i3.19519.
Azhary, Muhammad Royyan Faqih dkk. (2025). “UNDERSTANDING OF THE AYNA ALLAH HADITH: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY TAḤLĪLĪ STUDY.” Nabawi: Journal of Hadith Studies 5(2). https://doi.org/10.55987/njhs.v5i2.156.
Badrus, N., & Nabiel, M. (2020). “Corak Hadis Etimologi Terminologi dalam Memahami Struktur Penyusunan Hadis.” Samawat, 1–18.
Dāwud, A. Sulaymān ibn al-Ash‘ath. (2009). Sunan Abī Dāwud. Dar al-Risalah al-‘Alamiyyah.
Fathur Rahman. (1970). Ikhtisar Mushthalahul Hadist. PT. Al-Ma’arif.
Hakim, A. (1988). Hadist Ilmu Hadist. PT. Wicaksana.
Hakim, Lukman. (t.t.). Imdad al-Mughtis bi Tashili ‘Ulum al-Hadis. t.p.
Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ, ‘U. ibn ‘Abd al-Raḥmān. (t.t.). Muqaddimah Ibn al-Ṣalāḥ. Dar al-Fikr.
Ibn Manzhur. (1992). Lisan Al-‘Arab (Jilid 2). Dar al-Fikr.
Jaya, S. A. F. (2020). “Al-Qur’an Dan Hadis sebagai Sumber Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Indo-Islamika, 9(2), 204–216.
Kaharuddin, & Abdussahid. (2018). “HADIS SEBAGAI SUMBER HUKUM ISLAM: (Tinjauan Paham Inkar As-Sunnah, Syi’ah, dan Orientalis).” Tajdid: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Kemanusiaan, 2(2), 162–177.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Muhadjir, N. (2000). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi IV). Rake Sarasin.
Muslim ibn al-Ḥajjāj. (t.t.). Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim. Dar Ihya’ al-Turath al-‘Arabi.
Nirwana, D. (2012). “Rekonsepsi Hadits dalam Wacana Studi Islam (Telaah Terminologi Hadits, Sunnah, Khabar, dan Atsar).” Edu-Islamika, 4(2), 1–25.
Noorhidayati, S. (2017). Kritik Teks. Dialektika.
Qardhawi, Y. (1994). Metode Memahami as-Sunnah dengan Benar (S. Kamalie, Penerj.). Media Da’wah.
Shodiq, Muhammad dkk. (2025). “Analisis Kritis Metode Kritik Matan Al-Idlibi: Kontradiksi Hadis terhadap Al-Qur’an.” Qolamuna : Jurnal Studi Islam 11(1). https://www.ejournal.stismu.ac.id/ojs/index.php/qolamuna/article/view/2280.
Sholihah, H. (2023). “TERM-TERM PENTING TERKAIT HADITS DALAM KAJIAN HUKUM ISLAM.” AN-NAHDLIYYAH: JURNAL STUDI KEISLAMAN, 2(1), 62–86.
Thahan, M. Ṭ. (t.t.). Taisir Musthalah al-Hadits. t.p.
Wahid, R. A. (2005). Studi Ilmu Hadis. Citapustaka Media.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Lesna Tarida , Muhammad Fatchullah , Muhammad Royyan Faqih Azhary, Advan Navis Zubaidi (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
