ONLINE LENDING: BETWEEN MASLAHAH AND MAFSADAH
Keywords:
Lending, Online, Analysis, Maslahah, MafsadahAbstract
This study examines the phenomenon of online lending (Pinjol) that has become increasingly prevalent in recent times, characterized by its ease and speed in serving people who need money through rapid lending processes. Various needs of lower and middle-class communities are diverse, ranging from business requirements, entrepreneurial ventures, to urgent needs that cannot be avoided at certain times. The need of borrowers (creditors) to obtain loans from lenders (debtors) is certainly driven by necessity, and religion tolerates assisting those in need, as stated in the Qur'an. Creditors offer various forms of quick and easy facilities without difficulty, which appears to be beneficial (maslahah) for debtors. However, the benefits offered by lenders (debtors) through online platforms are not entirely within the context of maslahah. Various harms (mafsadah) and gaps in society have been found, such as reports of fraud (gharar), threats, and other issues experienced by victims who borrow (creditors). This research employs library research methodology, which is a series of efforts or activities that explore data collection through literature related to this study. This work draws from the Qur'an, tafsir (Qur'anic exegesis), books, articles, and relevant websites related to this theme. Therefore, this study examines the appropriate principles when observing the reality occurring in society, particularly in online lending (Pinjol). Based on various real elements, online lending does not fully guarantee maslahah within it, making the analysis of maslahah and mafsadah aspects crucial as a reference in lending and borrowing practices. The concern is that the dangers and threats far outweigh the comfort, pleasure, and happiness without threats. The theoretical framework employed is Al-Taraki's theory (b. 1917 CE - d. 1979 CE), which explains that maslahah is a characteristic found in legal arrangements for mukallaf (legally responsible individuals) in the form of drawing benefits and rejecting all forms of harm. Additionally, this study analyzes Qur'anic verse al-Baqarah/2: 245 as a form of reward or recompense from Allah, comparing lenders (debtors) who create difficulties experienced by borrowers (creditors).
Downloads
References
DAl-Hanafi, al-H. ’Alauddin M. i. (1971). Tahzib al-Kamal fi Asma’ ar-Rijal. Dar al-Kutb al-’Ilmiyah.
Firanda, G. A., Prananingtyas, P., & Lestari, S. N. (2019). Nagih utang (debt collector) pinjaman online berbasis financial technology. Diponegoro Law Journal, 8(4), 2523–2538.
Fitra, A. E. (2021). Dilema Pinjaman Online di Indonesia: Tinjauan Sosiologi Hukum dan Hukum Syariah. DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum, 19, 109–119. https://ejurnal.iainpare.ac.id/index.php/diktum/article/view/2162%0Ahttps://ejurnal.iainpare.ac.id/index.php/diktum/article/download/2162/921
Kahar, Achmad Abu Bakar, R. K. (2022). Al-Qardh (Pinjam-Meminjam) Dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an. Adz Dzahab, 7(2), 1–15.
Kamaruddin, S. (2021). Implementasi Akad Mudharabah Dan Musyarakah Pada Teknologi Finansial Syariah Dengan Pendekatan Kemaslahatan. UIN Syarif Hidayatullah. https://www.ptonline.com/articles/how-to-get-better-mfi-results
Khallaf, A. W. (2003). Ilmu Ushul Fikih Kaidah Hukum Islam. Pustaka Amani-Jakarta.
Marliani, Siagian, M. (2017). Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling. Al-Irsyad, 105(2), 79. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/322599509.pdf
Mas’ulah, I. (2021). Legalitas Pinjaman Online Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam. Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Islam, 5(2), 129–136.
Munawwir, A. W. (1997). Kamus Al-Munawwir Arab-Indonesia Terlengkap (Kedua). Pustaka Progressif.
Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. International ed.) Boston: Peason Education. https://www.amazon.co.uk/Social-Research-Methods-Quantitative/dp/0205786839/ref=sr_1_5?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1461496914&sr=1-5&keywords=social+research+methods+qualitative+and+quantitative+approaches
Nsafe, E., No, V., Seftiyana, A. D., Mahira, A. H., Febrianti, R., Kholifah, A., & Rahayu, S. D. (2022). Pinjaman Online Dalam Kacamata Islam: Apakah Sudah Sesuai Syariat Islam? 2(7), 103–112.
Pradnyawati, N. M. E., Sukandia, I. N., & Arini, D. G. D. (2021). Perjanjian Pinjaman Online Berbasis Financial Technology (Fintech). Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 2(2), 320–325. https://doi.org/10.22225/jkh.2.2.3230.320-325
Rasdiana, R. (2014). Strategi Komunikasi Dakwah di Radio Suara As’ Adiyah FM Sengkang (Telaah Format Siaran Program Religi Mimbar Agama Islam). http://repositori.uin-alauddin.ac.id/1482/
RI, K. A. (2019a). Moderasi Beragama (1st ed.). Badan Kementerian dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI. https://doi.org/10.25078/kalangwan.v12i1.737
RI, K. A. (2019b). Tanya Jawab Moderasi Beragama (1st ed., Issue 1). Badan Kementerian dan Diklat Kementerian Agama RI.
Rifai, M. N. (2020). Konsep Fintech Lending Dalam Perspektif Maqāṣid Syarī’ah. Islamic Economics Journal, 6(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.21111/iej.v6i1.4591
Rusdi, M. A. (2017). Maslahat Sebagai Metode Ijtihad Dan Tujuan Utama Hukum Islam. Jurnal Syari’ah Dan Hukum Diktum, 15(2).
Setiani, D. D., Nivanty, H., Lutfiah, W., & Rahmawati, L. (2020). Fintech syariah: manfaat dan problematika penerapan pada UMKM. Jurnal Masharif Al-Syariah: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Perbankan Syariah, 5(1), 75–90.
Shihab, M. Q. (2019). Wasathiyyah Wawasan Islam tentang Moderasi Beragama (Pertama). Lentera Hati.
Sugangga, R., & Sentoso, E. H. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengguna Pinjaman Online (Pinjol) Ilegal. Justice Journal Of Law), 01(01), 56. https://journal.unpak.ac.id/index.php/pajoul/index
Soerjono Soekanto & Sri Mamudji, Penelitian Hukum Normatif (Suatu Tinjauan Singkat), (JakartaL Rajawali Pers, 2009).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abd. Haris, Nurfaika (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








